PV glare analysis for airports
In air traffic, the concern is the safety of flight operations: pilots on approach, at touchdown and while taxiing, as well as control tower staff, should not be dazzled. For points along the approach, on taxiways and at the tower, PV-GlareCheck calculates when reflections occur, where they lie in the field of view and how bright they are.
Guidelines
EU – EASA. The certification specifications for aerodrome design (CS-ADR-DSN, guidance material GM1 ADR-DSN.M.615, Issue 7, applicable since 24 May 2025) describe glare on approach, at touchdown, while taxiing and for air traffic controllers. For solar modules, the guidance material names a maximum luminance of 20,000 cd/m².
USA – FAA. The 2021 policy covers solar systems on federally obligated airports with a control tower: there should be no glare in the control tower cab. It does not prescribe a specific tool. The superseded 2013 interim policy also covered the final approach and is still referred to in reports.
Others. OVE R 11-3 (Austria, formally withdrawn, unofficially often still applied for orientation) and the non-binding guideline of the Italian ENAC contain notes on air traffic. For Germany, the sources evaluated contain no quantitative criterion of their own; the requirements result from the procedure with the competent aviation authority.
What PV-GlareCheck calculates
- every minute of the year, under clear sky,
- the approach as a flight route with the height along the glide path and a tilted field of view (Pro plan),
- points for departure, traffic circuit, taxiways and the control tower,
- luminance and illuminance at the observation point for module types with a measured reflection profile,
- distance of the reflection from the line of sight, days and times of possible glare,
- occlusion by recorded buildings, hangars and vegetation and by the terrain.
Workflow
- Take the values from the approach chart: threshold, landing direction, threshold elevation, glide angle.
- Use the pre-analysis to check which flight paths lie in the direction of reflection at all.
- Draw the approach as a flight route, the tower and taxiways as points, then start the annual simulation.
- Set the filters per group in the report and export the result as a PDF.
Limits
The simulation is a model-based screening and does not replace an expert report. It does not calculate retinal irradiance or classify after-image potential. Each point of the route is stationary; cockpit and tower glazing are not modelled. The assessment remains with the responsible expert and the aviation authority.
Next: The manual leads step by step from the approach chart to the result, see manual, chapter VI.4 Air traffic.
Sources
- European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA): Certification Specifications and Guidance Material for Aerodromes Design (CS-ADR-DSN), GM1 ADR-DSN.M.615. Issue 7, ED Decision 2025/004/R, applicable since 24 May 2025; same wording in Issue 6, ED Decision 2022/006/R, 29 Mar 2022; previously Issue 4, ED Decision 2017/021/R.
- Federal Aviation Administration (FAA): Federal Aviation Administration Policy: Review of Solar Energy System Projects on Federally-Obligated Airports. Federal Register Vol. 86, No. 89, 11 May 2021, pp. 25801–25803, FR Doc. 2021-09862.
- Federal Aviation Administration (FAA): Interim Policy, FAA Review of Solar Energy System Projects on Federally Obligated Airports. Federal Register Vol. 78, No. 205, 23 Oct 2013, pp. 63276–63279, FR Doc. 2013-24729. Superseded by the 2021 policy; used in Ch. VI.4.
- OVE Österreichischer Verband für Elektrotechnik: OVE-Richtlinie R 11-3, Blendung durch Photovoltaikanlagen. Edition 2016-11-01, Vienna. Formally withdrawn on 1 Dec 2024 (OVE Standardization News 1/2025, p. 1), unofficially still often used for orientation.
- Ente Nazionale per l’Aviazione Civile (ENAC): Linee Guida LG–2022/002-APT, Valutazione degli impianti fotovoltaici nei dintorni aeroportuali. Edition 1, 26 Apr 2022, not binding.